There is a particular kind of instability that does not announce itself with collapse. It shows up instead in queues, unresponsive officials, in delayed emails, in partial payments, in students selling plates of food or opening crowdfunding links just to remain enrolled. This is the instability currently shaping the NSFAS experience.
On paper, the system still functions. Offices open at 8:30am. Applications are “processed.” Statements are released. Boards are appointed. Yet for thousands of students, the reality is far less procedural. It is uncertain, fragmented, and increasingly personal.
The cost of presence, and the cost of absence are entangled : NSFAS’s main Cape Town office is located in a premium CBD building on Christiaan Barnard Street. Commercial listings place office rentals in this precinct at roughly R205–R250 per square metre per month, meaning a mid-sized office floor can conservatively cost R100,000 or more per month, thats excluding VAT, utilities, security and fit-out.
This figure on its own is not the problem. The problem emerges when it exists alongside students who are:
- Unable to register due to outstanding fees,
- Receiving partial funding with no clarity on when balances will be settled, or
- Not funded at all, despite meeting eligibility criterias.
For a student sleeping on a friend’s couch or crowdfunding R20,000 to secure accommodation, these numbers are not abstract. They become a moral question: what is being prioritised, and who is absorbing the risk when the system falters?

Government already owns and maintains buildings across provinces, why not rent there?. The continued reliance on high-cost commercial rentals, while students are told to “be patient,” introduces a troubling asymmetry: institutional stability is protected first; student stability is deferred.
While we think about that, there is the case of fractured leadership and downstream consequences. In November 2025, the NSFAS board chairperson resigned, citing a toxic governance environment. Allegations of bullying, intimidation, and dysfunction followed. Interim leadership was installed. “Reassurances” were made.
But, leadership instability does not remain contained at board level. It filters downward, into slowed decisions, unclear accountability, and internal paralysis. For students, this shows up not as governance headlines, but as:
- unanswered queries,
- delayed confirmations, and
- financial aid offices unable to give definitive answers.

The timing is critical. November is not a neutral month in higher education. It determines whether a student enters the next academic year prepared or precarious. When leadership ruptures at that moment, students carry the consequences long after press statements fade.
Crowdfunding is a symptom, not a solution. As smart as it is, students turning to crowdfunding is often framed as resilience. It is not. It is evidence of systemic failure being externalised. Crowdfunding rewards visibility, networks, language, and digital access. It quietly penalises the poor student who is offline, undocumented, or unwilling to perform their hardship publicly. It transforms access to education into a competition for sympathy.
When a state funding scheme implicitly relies on this as a pressure valve, it signals something dangerous: that education is still a right in policy, but a gamble in practice. None of this suggests that NSFAS is irrelevant or unnecessary. On the contrary, it remains one of the most important access mechanisms in South African education. But importance does not excuse insulation.
The picture that emerges is of a system that continues to house itself comfortably, even as its intended beneficiaries are made to improvise survival. A system where governance crises are internal, but consequences are outsourced to students and their families. The question students are left asking is not ideological. It is practical:
If the system can afford stability for itself, why can it not guarantee stability for me?
Until that question is answered, not in statements, but in outcomes, instability will remain the defining feature of the NSFAS experience. And once again, it will be the student, not the institution, who pays the price.
